General anesthesia with an endotracheal tube (ETT) is
performed safely countless times every day with an estimated anesthetic
complication rate between 0.0606 to 0.0905 occurrences per 1,000 surgical
discharges.1 Post-operative sore throat (POST) and post-operative
hoarseness (PH), however, remain a common complaint of intubated patients with
an estimated incidence of between 14-70%.2 High endotracheal tube
cuff pressure and large size ETTs have been implicated as causative factors.
These two factors have also been implicated in the catastrophic
complications of tracheal stenosis and recurrent laryngeal injuries.3,4 The simple method of regulating cuff pressure
with a cuff manometer and the use of smaller endotracheal tubes could limit
these complications.
Literature
Review:
In a thesis study by Evans 5 three different
means of inflating the ETT pilot balloon were compared: the injection and
palpation method, the minimum occlusive technique and the set volume of air.
Forty-six percent of the ETT cuffs were inflated using the pilot balloon
palpation technique, 28% using the set volume technique and 26% using the
minimum occlusive technique. Regardless of the technique, none of the cuff pressures was within the acceptable range of
20-30 cm H2O. pressure. Thirteen percent of cuff pressures were
below the minimum value necessary to prevent aspiration and 87% were inflated
above the accepted value, risking tracheal ischemia.
In a study by Liu (2010), 509 patients from 4 university
hospitals requiring general anesthesia with an endotracheal tube were studied
to investigate the short-term (hours) impact of endotracheal intubation and
cuff pressure. They were divided into two groups: control group did not measure
cuff pressure and the study group had the ETTc measured. Additionally, 20
patients whose duration of anesthesia was between 120 and 180 minutes were
selected from each group for fiberoptic bronchoscopy immediately after
extubation. There was no significant difference in sex, age, height, weight or
procedural length, The mean endotracheal tube cuff (ETTc) pressure measured
after manual palpation was 43 +/- 23.3 mmHg with the highest at 210 mmHg. The incidence of post procedural sore throat,
hoarseness and blood-streaked expectoration in the control group was significantly
higher than in the study group. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the 20 previous
selected patients from each group showed that the tracheal mucosa was injured
in varying degrees but the injury was more severe in the control group. The
authors suggest ETTc pressure monitoring and controlling in reducing
complications.6
Wujtewicz
(2009) analyzed ETT cuff pressure on the basis of the aneaesthesiolgist’s
experience. Results were compared to those obtained during a previous study
that was done in 2002. The physicians were divided into three groups according
to experience: group 1 – less than 2 years of practice, group II – 2-10 years
of practice and group III – over 10 years practice. He found a “tendency toward
over-inflation of endotracheal tube cuffs with the problem more common in
highly experienced anesthesiologists.” He also found “over-inflation was more
prevalent in 2009 than in 2002”.7 The graph below is the data from
Wujtewicz comparing 2002 to 2009:
Curiel8 studied forty patients who required
endotracheal intubation for elected surgery. Patients who had ETT cuff
pressures equal or less that 42 mmHg were assigned to group A, and those with
higher than 42 mmHg to group B. Tracheal pain was assessed at 60 minutes and 24
hours after extubation. The tracheal pain was similar at 60 minutes after
extubation but at 24 hours persisted only in 10% of subjects in group A and
53.3% of the subjects in group B, p= 0.00001. The authors concluded that there
is a need for routine monitoring of cuff pressure to avoid pressures that
exceeds the appropriate range of 20-30 mmHg.
In a study by Galinski9 that measured the ETTc
pressures of 107 patients intubated either by emergency out-of-hospital medical
teams or transferred patients. Eighty-eight of the patients were intubated
out-of-hospital and twenty-two were transfers between hospitals. The authors
found 79% to be greater than 27
cm H2O with a mean pressure of 56 cm (SD+/- 34 cm H2O)
for the out-of –hospital patients and a mean pressure of 69 cm H2O
(SD+/- 37 cm H2O) for the transferred patients.
In a study
from 2012, researchers measured the cuff pressure of 136 patients in the operating
room. Most of the pressures fell outside safe limits of 20-30 cm H2O.
The minimum cuff pressure was 1 cm H2O to a maximum of 120 with a
mean of 38 and SD of 31
The
problem of improper cuff inflation is not new. In 1988, Koay11
studied 200 patients undergoing general surgery with an endotracheal tube. The
patients were divided into 2 groups. The first group (control) had the pilot
balloons inflated with 5 cc of air. There was no record of intra-cuff pressure
in this group. In the study group, the cuffs were inflated using the ‘minimum
occlusion’ technique. The mean intracuff pressure measured in the study group
was 118.9 mmHg (SD = 54.3). The
authors also describe that the use of an endotracheal tube causes mucosal
damage at two main sites: the posterior larynx and the anterior and lateral
aspect of the trachea between the third and tenth rings. The authors state,
“The standard endotracheal tube acts as a curved lever and the posterior
larynx, especially the arytenoid and cricoid acts, as a fulcrum when the tube
is introduced into the trachea.” They also point out even a relatively
short period of endotracheal intubation can result in vocal cord paralysis and
tracheal stenosis.
<References> <More Studies>
<References> <More Studies>
No comments:
Post a Comment